It says:

> You may not upload photos that portray pornography, obscenity, or sexually explicit conduct

clearly artistic nudity (a recognized part of the photographic art) does not fall in the caterogies above, yet all the artistic nudity photos that i posted in some tribes have been removed.

that's really sad... very sad...
posted by:
tristan
SF Bay Area
  • Tribe does not remove these on their own. They allow ANYONE to flag your image for removal. So one person with 5 accounts can come into a gallery & flag one image they don't like 5 times (one time with each account) & your image is removed....

    Sounds like the brownshirts to me....
    • this is pretty ridiculous. the BM forum had many very nice photos with some nudity (but none with pornography, or course, and none was offensive), yet they have all disapeared, including all those that i uploaded.

      a good thing the flickr does not (yet) have the same policy - all by BM photos can still be see there through www.playa-dust.com .

      yet, i feel (and i'm not the only one) that tribe.net is going down the drain - mostly because they do what they corporate sponsors and advertizer want them to do. un-justified censorship is bad.
      • Stop complaining ! All hail the New Tribe.net Order ! Anything nude may excite the republicans on tribe.net and that may cause breeding, understand human !?
        Do you actually think they care about art here? Get with the program and start censoring people !
        • i see... now i understand: tribe.net makes it extremely easy to flag a photo:

          each time a photo is posted in a tribe, there is a posting in the tribe discussion - which is not a bad idea - but also, there is a link allowing people to flag the photo without even looking at it!

          when a photo is flagged, it would be nice to know who flagged it. i.e. at least censorship should not be anonymous and cowardly!
  • Yeah. Tribe has been a bit of a struggle for me ever since they used the 2257 excuse to bar even things like artistic nude. One thing to note is that Tribe.net is not the only site out there that uses a very broad venacular with the word "obscene" and other monikers that are open. I like to give communities the benefit of the doubt that they use such broadness in order to prevent the site or community's rules from resembling a penal code. However I have also seen this kind of broad, general wording as methods to deem whoever they want as ban-worthy, hiding behind the broadness of the rules set forth.

    I agree with tristan that this is a sad state of affairs and has made me seriously reconsider my viewpoint on tribe over and over (amongst the constant downtimes and now this premium service that is trying to be sold to us). Call me someone who just wont listen to authority and what have you, but its kind of hard to follow a rule that seems to be set up out of convenience to image and/or wallet.


Recent topics in "TribeIdeas"

Topic Author Replies Last Post
ABUSE OF THE "FLAG" Rocky 7 July 8, 2008
Daily digests offlineFearless Leader 0 June 26, 2008
Site performance issues offlineBrian 1 June 20, 2008
an idea 1 June 19, 2008